4. For the programs/services they indicated above, participants were asked how they were
evaluated (free response, coded). 16.5%, or 27 people, responded.
• 62% indicated by survey
• 12% indicated evaluation by successful distribution of the resources
• 12% indicated measurement of attendance to events
• 11% did not know
• 8% by peer review feedback
5. What were the results of the evaluations (free response, coded)? 16.5%, 27 answered.
The percentages are representative of the responses from the 27 people who answered:
Results Response Count
(out of 27)
Percent Positive
14 52%
TBD (in process)
2 7%
N/A 5
19%
Satisfactory 2
7%
Negative 2
7%
Other 2
7%
Part IV: Barriers and Campus Service Improvement Needs
All free response answers were coded into categories. Participants could write in multiple
responses to each question.
1. Participants cited the following as the greatest challenges their institution faces in
providing the best services for students with an eating disorder (72%, 118 answered):
• Limited time and funding
• Stigma preventing outreach and use of services provided
• Lack of specialized professionals/Eating Disorder Treatment Team
• Lack of student interest
2. Participants described what their institution has done to try to meet these challenges
with the following (54%, 89 answered):
• Increased awareness efforts
• Increasing ED specialized staff through new hires and trainings for current staff
• Referrals to off campus resources
• Created treatment teams and multi–disciplinary collaboration
• Fundraising
• Nothing, or participant did not know
32